![Richie3Jack](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 112
- 1 520 388
Richie3Jack
Приєднався 12 лют 2009
Відео
MOI and MOI Balance Index
Переглядів 2,8 тис.11 років тому
Discussion for Part VI of my series called 'The Road to Club Fitting Nirvana' on my blog at 3jack.blogspot.com. Here I talk about MOI matching clubs and MOI Balance Index matching clubs for the ultimate clubitting experiences.
Week In Review - 1.27.13
Переглядів 22211 років тому
This week I discuss: - 2013 PGA Merchandise Show - My WITB for 2013 - Clubfitting Steve Stricker - The Brian Gay and the Search for Power article on GolfWRX
Week In Review 1.20.13
Переглядів 12811 років тому
I discuss: 1. New GolfWRX column and the numbers behind 'going low.' 2. 2013 PGA Merchandise Show 3. Faldo model irons by Edel Golf 4. 10 Questions to ask an instructor video 5. My 2013 tournament schedule
Week in Review - 1.13.13
Переглядів 10611 років тому
This week I discuss: - New GolfWRX.com column coming up - 3Jack's 2013 Golf Resolutions - 5th Annual 3Jack Awards - 2013 PGA Merchandise Show Preview - Putting Video with Jim Goergen
Week In Review 1.6.13
Переглядів 14211 років тому
Week In Review for the 3Jack Golf Blog at 3jack.blogspot.com. This week I discuss the release of the e-book 2012 Pro Golf Synopsis; The Moneyball Approach to the Game of Golf. This book is available on the blog for only $10. I discuss the numbers behind a golfer's bag setup and what factors come in play (from a numbers perspective) as to whether a golfer should bag an extra hybrid/long iron ver...
Week In Review 11.18.12
Переглядів 13011 років тому
This week I discuss: 1. AimPoint Practice 2. Tips for Prospective Collegiate Golfers 3. Driving Effectiveness on the PGA Tour 4. What amateurs can learn from the Driving Effectiveness numbers 5. Flop shot video at 24,000 FPS thoughts
3Jack Golf Blog Week in Review 9.30.12 - Part II
Переглядів 12811 років тому
3Jack Golf Blog Week in Review 9.30.12 - Part II
3Jack Golf Blog Week in Review 9.30.12
Переглядів 23111 років тому
3Jack Golf Blog Week in Review 9.30.12
Does he ever shut up and get to the point
Chart to reduce steps Club-Carry:Roll SW - 1:1 PW- 1:2 9i- 1:3 8i- 1:4 7i- 1:5 6i- 1:6
An easier way, IMO, is just to stand at your ball and count your steps to the pin. Then go back and pick your landing spot. Pace that off. Divide the total by your landing spot. That’s the number you subtract from 12. You’re not always going to get a whole number. Say you’ve got a total of 21 paces and a landing zone of 5 paces. That’s 4.25. 12-4 = 8 and if you think about it you’ll see the chip will be a bit short. So make sure you carry your spot. Or if you want to get move your spot so it will result in EXACTLY 4…. 21/4= 5.25. Don’t just carry your previous spot, carry it by a 1/4 pace. And remember you’re just using your pace, not yards or meters. But as people will tell you, this is still an art. Greens are slow? Use Rule of 11. Downhill? Rule of 13. Thing is, you’ve already been doing these mental calculations. Thing also is you aren’t doing so hot at that or you wouldn’t be watching this. At least here you’re starting off with a SOLID CONCEPT.
Very well explained
I use this all the time and works like a charm...i can literally pick any target on the green to chip to and have the formula to pick the right club I changed it up a because tracking how many "parts" of roll and carry is a bit confusing for me...i just take the total number of steps to the hole divided by the total number of steps to my landing area to arrive at my "maguc number"... Give a try folks!
I spoke about this years ago with my paps. Since we have been out on the course practicing it often with great success getting the ball close with consistency being the key!!!!
Why not just know the roll of 2-3 clubs by heart and select your landing spot on the green accordingly based on your lie and the green features??
you are making it to confusing.
blimey you made it sound so much more complex than it is. divide the roll by the pitch and take the result from 12.
Brian, I think this is calling for an algorithm because you forgot to take the speed of the green, as calculated by the Stimp meter into account. Anyone who has played a lot of golf has probably experienced greens ranging from 7 or 8 on the Stimp meter to 12, 13, or even 14. Now then, we also have to factor in whether the shot is uphill or downhill or even sidehill. If you're over the 18th green while playing The Lake Course at The Olympic Club or the 11th hole at Pasatiempo or the 7th Hole at San Francisco Golf Club, you've got troubles, Bubba. And, conversely if you're playing those exact same holes and have an uphill chip to the greens...good luck with "dat". So, now we're getting into Bryson deChambeau Golf where you have to carry an iPad around. Having played this game since 1957, it's way more fun when you take all this SCIENCE AND MATH out and just have to judge the shot using your own skill and nothing else. The San Francisco Golf Club, a very traditional old time course and extremely beautiful, does not have any signs whatsoever. There are no Tee Signs, no Yardage Markers, No RAKE TRAPS etc. When you play there, it's truly a "game" of golf which emphasizes the golfer's ability to size up shots, figure distance and just "play" the game without any math or science or visual aids. You can't imagine how much fun that is. Wouldn't we all like to see at least one PGA Tournament a year where these rules apply? What do you think about this?
Good logic going to tyr it
Excellent tip and explanation, thanks.
Simple , efficient way to learn the short game. You know he's good when he can talk a execute at the same time. Great job!
Excellent video!!!
Don't forget, you can also putt with a hybrid,in this rule I guess that's where a 3 or 4 iron would be used ie 8 parts roll.
You couldn't more confusing with your parts and rolls
Whete is the whip effect then ?
What about 48 or 52 degree wedges? Good video👍⛳️
Where can I view the MOI Balance Index chart? I can’t seem to find it.
Wow. Nice
This is gold, thanks.
excellent method but i do wonder about when the pin is close to the rough. Say you're five paces back and the pin is two paces on the green...
I like the idea of hitting it to the spot and letting it roll... the measuring... I'll wing it.
Here's the "non-math" to what he is saying.: A sand wedge rolls 1-1 a PW 2-1, a 9-iron 3-1..keep doing the math. It's easy. Pick the spot you want to land it and then figure out what club you need. Sometimes his "safe" spot is on a side slope to you need to fly the ball over it, so you might end up using a SW where if you just chipped on the green a couple of feet with a longer club the ball would turn and run down a slope.
Thanks brian miss you bro! Loved playing on Monday in New Orleans back in the day!
i need 3 strokes to get to the landing spot.
Thank you, looks like a great drill easy to follow all the way to the finish.
Practice making putts inside ten feet and chip with whatever club you want!
I totally understand the concept of this, but I also understand how the math of it can be extremely confusing based on the scenario. That's why you practice with multiple clubs and hundreds of scenarios... You'll get it at some point.
If your landing spot is not level I find it can wreak havoc on the ratios for the more lofted clubs.
Hoping this takes me to 39 finally
The hole was 12 parts from my landing spot, so I simply used my driver to effortlessly float the ball in
Would this work? There's a quick, easy way to do the math. 1. Pace your self from the ball to the 'safe zone.' 2. Then pace the entire distance from the safe zone to the cup. 3. Then, you go #2 / #1 For instance. Let's say the pace from the ball to the say zone is 5 paces. Then the total distance from the safe zone to the cup is 15 paces. 15 / 5 = 3 12-3 = 9 iron
Paces to safe zone 15 Paces from safe zone to flag 3. What club?
Excellent, thanks!
its an interesting swing to look at. but not explosive thru impact and follow thru like Hogan. pure drag approach doesn't capture the "3 right hands"
Disagree. The position of the shaft and hands plus the speed through impact is faster than his languid swing appears to the eye. Sure, it's not a mirror image of Hogan's but it's pretty damn sublime.
His impact alignments are superb
@@scottsanders2641 his body motion is good and footwork exceptional. His impact and follow thru are just missing the Hogan explosiveness. It's almost like he's trying too hard to de-emphasize hands and arms to the point of not using them enough.
Great video but a lot of it also has a lot to do with green speed
Here from GolfSidekick - WADDATIP!
I don't have time for a Phd
Kind of funny to be linked here from sidekick. This makes it far more confusing and complicated to chip ..simple way i think is higher lofts roll out less lower lofts roll out more ...
I tried this and my round took three days.
Is there an app for this ?!?
3 parts roll. Subtract 3 from 12. Apply a little algebra and move the 12 to the left side and the 3 to the right side of the equation. Now you have 12-3. 12-3=9. To make subtraction a bit easier, add 8 to each number, i.e. 20-11 for simpler subtraction. After this difficult calculation, look in golf bag and choose the iron that has the number 9 on it. Yes, very difficult if math-challenged. Recommend bringing a calculator.
@6:45 "lucky it hit the pin" What a show off
So many reasons why you should never do this.
No clue what hes talking about . 2 part 3 part 4 part , 2 steps 3 steps ??? Lol
if it takes 2 yards to land on the first spot and it rolled 6 yards to get to the hole, then the club to use will be a 12-(6 divide by 2 yards=3)=9 iron
@@traviskoh999 LOL fuck sake . how bout this , looks like a bump and run hand me a 9 iron?? 😂
1 year later im still trying to figure this out lol
@@jammielettgolf5154 the numbers are to help you with distances and where to land the ball. You need to walk to the hole and count the total distances before selecting your club.
WTH did you say again 😯
I used this method and failed math.. Cause 3 minus 12 is -9.. great lesson though.. Can't wait to try it
how do you know where the safe spot is?!
It depends how far you are from the green. If you are just on the fringe, then a spot 1 yard on should be easy to hit. On the other hand , if you are 10 yards from the green, a spot 1 yard on is much more difficult to hit. If you misjudge the hit the ball could land short of the green and the roll out will be much shorter. So from 10 yards out you might pick a spot 2 yards on . If going over a bunker a spot 3 or 4 yards on might be best , even if that means the ball will roll out well past the hole.
Flop shot with a 60* for everything.
Very well articulated